ArXiv imposes year-long ban on authors abusing AI for research papers

ArXiv, the influential preprint repository for scientific research, has announced stricter enforcement policies against authors who use large language models to generate entire research papers without proper human review. The platform will now ban researchers for one year if they submit papers created entirely by AI without adequate human oversight or contribution.

ArXiv, the widely-used online repository for preprints of scientific papers, is escalating its efforts to combat the misuse of artificial intelligence in academic publishing. The platform has announced that it will enforce a one-year ban on authors who submit research papers generated entirely by large language models without meaningful human involvement or verification.

The move reflects growing concerns within the scientific community about the quality and integrity of AI-generated research submissions. ArXiv serves as a critical platform where researchers across physics, mathematics, computer science, and other disciplines share their work before formal peer review, making the quality of submissions essential to the research ecosystem.

Under the new enforcement approach, ArXiv will take a stricter stance on papers that appear to be created solely through AI generation without proper human oversight. The platform's moderators will investigate submissions that show signs of wholesale AI authorship, where authors have delegated the entire research process, analysis, and writing to language models without contributing their own intellectual work or verification.

This crackdown aims to preserve the credibility of preprint publishing while acknowledging that AI tools can serve legitimate purposes in research when used appropriately. The distinction the platform is making is between researchers using AI as an assistive tool-such as for editing, organizing, or streamlining certain tasks-and those who outsource the entire research effort to algorithms.

The ban enforcement represents ArXiv's effort to maintain scientific standards as artificial intelligence becomes increasingly capable of producing plausible-sounding but potentially unreliable academic content. Researchers who violate the policy face temporary loss of their submission privileges, sending a clear signal about the platform's expectations for responsible research conduct in the AI era.